• Home
  • Project Delivery
  • Project Management Consultants
  • Agile Services
  • Team Training
  • Training
  • Services

PM Partners

  • What We Do
  • Success Stories
  • Insights
  • Contact
  • Training

    TRAINING DELIVERY

    • Course List
    • Course Schedule
    • eLearning Courses
    • Specials and Promos

    LEARNING PATHWAYS

    • Scrum and Agile
    • Project and Programme
    • Business Analysis

    MOST POPULAR

    • Scrum Master Certified (SMC™)
    • Agile Project Management
    • PRINCE2®
    • Project Management Fundamentals
    • Business Analysis Fundamentals
    • Leading SAFe® 5.1
  • Project Delivery
  • Project Management Consultants
  • Agile Services
  • Team Training
  • Home
  • Insights
  • Making Strong Connections: Effective Communications For Successful Change Management
April 13, 2021

Making Strong Connections: Effective Communications For Successful Change Management

Making Strong Connections: Effective Communications For Successful Change Management

Wednesday, 01 January 2020 / Published in Uncategorised

When it comes to successful change management, communication is everything.

Experts say ineffective, inadequate, poorly conceived, and/or poorly timed communications can actually create resistance to change[i]. But how can you cut through all the noise out there and find an approach that resonates and feels authentic to you?

Drawing from different experts, research and concepts, we’ve compiled seven factors to consider when creating an internal communications strategy for change management:

1. First and foremost, articulate and make it known, the difference between project management and change management. It seems simple, but a refresher never hurts, especially among diverse teams that have a mix of both project management professionals and non-project and/or technical staff.

In a nutshell, a project manager is focused on development, governance and implementation; a change manager is focused on how change affects the trajectory of the project, and therefore, how stakeholders and end users are impacted and engaged. Having a clear definition of the difference of these roles, is the first and foremost step for creating an effective understanding and subsequent alignment with stakeholders.

2. With that distinction in mind, keep project management and change management separate. While the two need to be whole heartedly aligned, simply absorbing change communication as part of project management risks making it an entry into a project plan, versus a holistic force of transformation. Each function plays a pivotal role, particularly for large scale or high impact change, and both areas should be valued and invested in appropriately for the best possible change and business outcomes.

3. Connect the dots. Paul Landy, Chief of People & Transformation at QSuper, a Brisbane-based supperannuation fund, stressed the value of communication in a recent coversation[ii]  with Australia’s Human Resources Director magazine (HRD) “You need to listen broadly and take time to understand the playing field at all levels – understanding the connectivity points across the business and the big levers to pull will result in not only great results for an organisation but also for its people,” he told the magazine. “If you can show the business that you are approaching transformation from both an employee and a company perspective, they are much more likely to support your transformation.” In other words, change management needs to be largely focused from the bottom-up, not just the top-down.

4. Embrace new workplace models of communication. In ‘Change Management 2.0’, a new whitepaper[iii] earning a featured spot on the Change Management Institute website, Ira Blake argues that “fundamental social and technological shifts, such as social and enterprise networking, virtual organisations, and blurring of the line between work and life, are changing the way people live, work and collaborate.” This, she says, will force change managers to “rethink their basic assumptions of communication.” Blake, author of ‘Project Managing Change’ and assessor for the Change Management Institute, makes a compelling case that the future of change management will move in the following directions:

 

Out In
Platforms Programmes
Top-down Activist-out
Sold Invited
Managed Organic

 

Source: Figure 5 – “Change Management 2.0” [iv]

5. Engage team members and stakeholders where they are. Blake also poses an interesting notion by encouraging change managers to “design new approaches” to communication, citing examples such as hackathons, “randomised coffee trials” and connecting via online and off-line communities of interest. Such initiatives will depend on the environment and audience, but in essence, creative thinking is in order for better engagement and buy-in.

6. Be vulnerable. Communication is nothing without honesty, transparency and trust. “A new psychological contract is required between managers and employees characterised by diminishing hierarchical power, a culture of permission and individual courage,” Blake writes.

7. Focus on integrative strategies. “Leadership, communication and culture are the triumvirate bedrock for change, be it good or bad, effective or ineffective”, as inferred by “A Communicator’s Guide to Successful Change Management[v],” an amalgam of advice and insights from noted practitioners and thought leaders and edited by Craig Pearce. The guide highlights valuable research that invites further investigation, including a study by Towers Watson[vi] that found that companies with effective change management communications are “three and a half times more likely to significantly outperform their industry peers than firms that are not effective in these areas.” The report also found managers can have a major impact in helping communicate change, calling them a “catalyst for building community”.

Everyone wants to be a better communicator and we can all agree change is here to stay.

By insisting on an organic, earnest core to every part of your internal communications strategy, and discarding old top-down, control-based methodologies, change may no longer be the resisted notion it once was.

Tell us, what internal communications approaches or strategies have you found especially helpful in effective change management?

 

 

[i]http://knowledge.senndelaney.com/docs/thought_papers/pdf/communications_2014.pdf

[ii]http://www.hcamag.com/hr-resources/hr-event-resources/leadership-special-report-leadership-vision-222649.aspx

[iii]https://www.change-management-institute.com/australia

[iv] https://www.change-management-institute.com/sites/default/files/CMI%20White%20Paper_Evolution%20and%20Themes%20in%20Change%20Management_Ira%20Blake.pdf

[v]https://aumeaningbusiness.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/extract-a-communicators-guide-to-successful-change-management.pdf

[vi]https://www.towerswatson.com/en-US/Insights/IC-Types/Survey-Research-Results/2013/12/2013-2014-change-and-communication-roi-study

 

 

What you can read next

Movember 2016
BABOK® Guide v3
PRINCE2® Fact or Reality?

GENERAL ENQUIRY
1300 70 13 14

CONTACT US
Send a message

FOLLOW US

Registered Project Management Education Provider

PM-Partners group is a DASA training partner, a Project Management Institute (PMI)® Global Registered Education Provider (R.E.P), an APMG-International Accredited Training Organisation (ATO), an AXELOS Certified Partner, an accredited partner of PeopleCert (Partner ID: 3800), an Endorsed Education Provider™ (EEP™) for the International Institute for Business Analysis™ (IIBA®), a Scaled Agile Silver Partner and a Microsoft® EPM Solution Partner. PMI, CAPM, Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM), PMP, Project Management Professional (PMP) and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. PRINCE2®, AgileSHIFT®, MSP®, P3O®, MoP®, ITIL®, PRINCE2 Agile®, P3M3® are registered trade marks of AXELOS Limited, used under permission of AXELOS Limited. All rights reserved. The Certified Partner, Partner Programme Logo and Swirl Logo™ are trade marks of AXELOS Limited, used under permission of AXELOS Limited. All rights reserved. AgilePM®, AgilePgM®, AgileBA® and DSDM® are registered trademarks of Agile Business Consortium Limited. All rights reserved. APMG International Change Management, APMG International Facilitation and APMG International Lean Six Sigma are trademarks of The APM Group Limited. All rights reserved. The APMG-International AgilePM, AgilePgM, AgileBA, Change Management, Managing Benefits, Facilitation, Lean Six Sigma and Swirl Device logos are trademarks of The APM Group Limited, used under permission of The APM Group Limited. All rights reservedSMC™ and SPOC™ are trademarks of SCRUMstudy. Scaled Agile Framework® and SAFe® are registered trade marks of Scaled Agile, Inc. IIBA®, the IIBA® logo, BABOK® Guide and Business Analysis Body of Knowledge® are registered trademarks owned by International Institute of Business Analysis. CBAP® and CCBA® are registered certification marks owned by International Institute of Business Analysis. Certified Business Analysis Professional™, Certification of Competency in Business Analysis™, Endorsed Education Provider™, EEP™ and the EEP logo are trademarks owned by International Institute of Business Analysis.

Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Timesheets | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 1996-2021 PM-Partners Group. Delivery Advisory Capability. All Rights Reserved.

TOP