1300 70 13 14
PM Partners
  • Services

    Training and Capability uplift
    Advisory
    Agile
    Scaled Agile (SAFe®)
    Delivery
    Resourcing
    PM-Digital
    Hire an expert

    Recent case studies

    View all case studies

    world map with silhouettes of people in the background

    Shifting from a programme to a solution model through SAFe® to drive CX ecosystem stability

    businessman in suit looking at futuristic tech dashboard against cityscape

    From data to insights: A Power BI dashboard for FOSS component management

    • Training and Capability uplift
    • Advisory
    • Agile
    • Scaled Agile (SAFe®)
    • Delivery
    • Resourcing
    • PM-Digital
    • Hire an expert
  • Industries

    Government
    Higher education
    Construction
    Financial services
    Energy and utilities
    Healthcare and pharma

    Featured case study

    View all case studies

    Two workers in a warehouse holding digital tablet with hardhat and safety vest

    PM-Partners helps Downer set new industry standards for project management workforce development with award-winning ‘Project Plus’ initiative.

    LEARN MORE

    • Government
    • Higher education
    • Construction
    • Financial services
    • Energy and utilities
    • Healthcare and pharma
    • Case studies
  • Resources

    Insights
    Case studies
    Complexity assessment
    Capability hub
    Knowledge hub
    eBooks and white papers
    Checklists and infographics

    Featured insight

    View all insights

    Benefits of implementing SAFe in 2025 - post

    Benefits of implementing SAFe in 2025

    LEARN MORE

    • Insights
    • Case studies
    • Complexity assessment
    • Capability hub
    • Knowledge Hub
    • eBooks & white papers
    • Checklists and infographics
  • About

    What we do
    Who we are
    Leadership team
    Join the team
    Our beliefs
    Our partners

    Upcoming events

    View all events

    tig-events-01

    12 Aug 2025

    Tech in Gov

    • Events
    • What we do
    • Who we are
    • Leadership team
    • Join the team
    • Our beliefs
    • Our partners
  • Contact us
  • Training Courses
    • Promotions & special offers
    • Course list
    • Course Calendar
    • Group bookings
    • In-house training
    • Capability uplift
    • Training catalogue

    Popular pages

    Hybrid classroom
    Learning pathways
    Room hire
    Meet our trainers
    eLearning courses
    Power skills courses

    Popular courses

    View all courses

    Scrum Master Certified (SMC®)
    Agile Project Management
    PRINCE2®
    Project Management Fundamentals
    Business Analysis Fundamentals
    Running an effective Hybrid PMO

    • Promotions and special offers
    • Course list
    • Course calendar
    • Group bookings
    • In house training
    • Capability uplift
    • Training catalogue
    • POPULAR PAGES
    • Hybrid classroom
    • Learning pathways
    • Room hire
    • Meet our trainers
    • eLearning courses
    • Power skills Courses
    • POPULAR COURSES
    • Scrum Master Certified (SMC®)
    • Agile Project Management
    • PRINCE2®
    • Project Management Fundamentals
    • Business Analysis Fundamentals
    • Running an Effective Hybrid PMO
  • No products in cart.
  • Home
  • News and Team
  • Should organisations keep ‘running’ and ‘changing’ their business separately?
June 12, 2025

Should organisations keep ‘running’ and ‘changing’ their business separately?

Should organisations keep ‘running’ and ‘changing’ their business separately?

Monday, 11 May 2020 / Published in News and Team
evolving business pm partners

The modern business environment demands that any organisation seeking to gain a competitive edge must first maximise its own value. Such value can come from a variety of sources – e.g. developing new products and services, adopting more efficient business models, entering new sectors – and depends entirely on your industry and market intentions.

Whatever the case, there is a growing acceptance that organisations must be in a constant state of evolution (or at the very least improvement) in order to survive. But does that mean our traditional models of change must evolve as well?

RUNNING AND CHANGING: THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO BUSINESS EVOLUTION

In recent decades, businesses have embraced the concept of separating their strategies for running the organisation (RTO) and changing the organisation (CTO). On the ground, this tends to involve the RTO side of the business maintaining its current services (perhaps with minor operational or service improvements) while the CTO element is tasked with transforming how the business operates or the products it sells.

The benefit of this partitioned approach is that the CTO element can step away from the day-to-day operations, instead focusing all their time and energy into transforming the organisation for the better. This separation also allows for clearer thinking, unhampered by traditional ways of working and legacy systems. In the meantime, the RTO team is able to maintain business-as-usual activities without getting distracted by new ideas that may never come to fruition.

Innovation labs are the perfect example of the CTO set-up. Isolated from the regular business and made up of the organisation’s most creative individuals, the endgame is to ultimately deliver transformational change. In an ideal world, this change can be easily adopted by the main RTO business while the CTO element moves onto its next transformation initiative.

Some organisations have even gone so far as setting up (or acquiring) startups with the aim of disrupting the main organisation.

THE PROBLEM WITH INNOVATION LABS

Although separation of the CTO element offers a wealth of benefits, it can just as easily create headaches – and, in the worst cases, irrevocably change the organisation for the worse.

Perhaps the biggest concern for business owners is one that Piyush Gupta, CEO of DBS, succinctly sums up: “I realised then that a lack of ownership at the core of a company is a hurdle. There were too many detractors, people on the sidelines, taking potshots.”

In short, forcing the team tasked with changing the organisation to sit at the periphery makes it extremely difficult for it to be effective. Moreover, it creates friction between the RTO and CTO functions.

Such separation also runs the risk of strategic misalignment. The role of the CTO function is fundamental to the organisation’s long-term success, so by removing them from the day-to-day operations they can easily end up running in a whole different direction. This is compounded when the RTO function makes strategic decisions that are fundamentally at odds with the direction the CTO team is taking.

Finally, separated units tend to focus on the technology element rather than any process or cultural change. It’s an easy trap to fall into, especially if your competitors are constantly developing new products. Yet it is just as important (and almost certainly harder) for organisations to transform their culture and mindset first.

A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO TRANSFORMATION

What we’ve discussed above is the worst-case scenario, but it’s necessary to highlight the importance of taking an integrated approach to transformation.

The kind of transformational change that organisations want to achieve requires a fundamental shift in how they think, how they operate and how they evolve. For this to succeed, however, there must be total buy-in from the organisation – otherwise you are simply making a difficult task even harder. Strategic alignment from the top down with open communication and a healthy feedback loop is the only effective way for real change to occur.

Despite the criticisms, it’s also worth noting that innovation labs do have a place in this structure. However, they must be well aligned to the rest of the organisation, be in constant consultation with management, and ensure their creation is not at the expense of the RTO element.

When RTO and CTO are viewed as separate entities of the same organisation, then the business itself can never fully realise the benefits and value of transformation. Instead, combining the two has the potential to help the organisation succeed over the long term.

RTO AND CTO: TO COMBINE OR NOT TO COMBINE?

Although taking a combined approach to running and changing the organisation (with only some degree of separation) is the ideal strategy, achieving it is no easy task.

A transformational shift requires effort from the entire organisation and must cover technology, people, culture, processes and structural change – to name just a few critical pillars. There is no template for success, and once change has occurred it’s time to start the next phase of evolution in order to remain competitive.

The key takeaway? Organisations should never remain static; change is a necessary constant.

Change is inevitable for any organisation that wants to succeed, but transformation comes in all shapes and sizes. Speak to the experts at PM-Partners today about how we can help your business change and run at the same time.

What you can read next

Group of women smiling
IWD: Tackling gender challenges in project management
Quote from Dominic Frost
Dominic Frost takes the helm as new CEO of PM-Partners
cut costs while upskilling pm partners
Employee training: how can you cut costs while upskilling?

GENERAL ENQUIRY
1300 70 13 14

CONTACT US
Send a message

FOLLOW US

  • LinkedIn logo
  • X logo
  • Facebook logo
  • Instagram logo
Partner logos

PM-Partners group is a Project Management Institute (PMI)® – Premier Authorised Training Partner (ATP) (ID: 1394), an APMG-International Accredited Training Organisation (ATO), a Gold partner of PeopleCert (Partner ID: 3800), an Endorsed Education Provider™ (EEP™) of International Institute for Business Analysis™ (IIBA®), a Scaled Agile Gold Partner, an ICAgile Member Organisation, a GPM Accredited Training Partner, and a Microsoft® EPM Solution Partner. PMI, CAPM, Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM), PMP, Project Management Professional (PMP), PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP) and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. Provider is a member of the PMI ATP Program. PMI does not specifically endorse, approve, or warrant ATP’s products, courses, publications, or services. The PMI ATP seal is a registered mark of the Project Management Institute, Inc. PRINCE2®, AgileSHIFT®, MSP®, P3O®, MoP®, ITIL® , PRINCE2 Agile®, DEVOPS INSTITUTE® and DEVOPS FOUNDATION® are registered trademarks of the PeopleCert group. Used under licence from PeopleCert. All rights reserved. AgilePM®, AgilePgM®, AgileBA® and DSDM® are registered trademarks of Agile Business Consortium Limited. All rights reserved. APMG International Change Management, APMG International Lean Six Sigma are trademarks of The APM Group Limited. All rights reserved. The APMG-International, APMG-International AgilePM, AgilePgM, AgileBA, Change Management, Managing Benefits, Lean Six Sigma and Swirl Device logos are trademarks of The APM Group Limited, used under permission of The APM Group Limited. All rights reserved. SMC® and SPOC® are trademarks of SCRUMstudy. Scaled Agile Framework® and SAFe® are registered trade marks of Scaled Agile, Inc.

IIBA®, the IIBA® logo, BABOK® Guide, Business Analysis Body of Knowledge®, Business Analysis Core Concept Model™, BACCM™, Endorsed Education Provider™, EEP™ and the EEP™ logo are (registered) trademarks owned by International Institute of Business Analysis. Entry Certificate in Business Analysis™, ECBA™, Certified Business Analysis Professional™, CBAP®, Certification of Capability in Business Analysis™ and CCBA® are (registered) certification marks owned by International Institute of Business Analysis. These trademarks, logos and certification marks are used with the express permission of International Institute of Business Analysis.

House of PMO Essentials for PMO Administrators™ and House of PMO Essentials for PMO Analysts™ are trademarks of House of PMO Limited. All rights reserved. Praxis Framework™ is a trademark of Praxis Framework Limited. ICAgile is a registered trade mark of the International Consortium for Agile. GPM® and Green Project Management® are Registered Trademarks of GPM Global ©Copyright GPM Global 2022. www.greenprojectmanagement.org. ©PRiSM™ is used with consent.

Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Timesheets | Terms & Conditions | Capability Hub
Copyright © 1996-2025 PM-Partners Group. Delivery Advisory Capability. All Rights Reserved.

TOP

EOFY Training Offers: Save 30% on a great range of classroom and virtual training courses! T&Cs apply.

BOOK NOW
X